I can do it!!

Author Archive

May 6- Pastor Paul Begley

Pastor Paul Begley is an evangelist, radio talk show host of , “Coming Apocalypse”  and bible prophecy teacher who has seen over 2,000 salvations in the last two years. A fourth generational preacher, he was ordained by Dr. Lester Sumrall.  Paul’s story on the Hosea Prophecy Texas Blood Lake was covered by The Christian Post, MSNBC, Fox News, CNN, Yahoo News, ABC News, CBS News, the Moscow Times, and multiple newspapers such as LA Times, Chicago Tribune, and NY Times.

Paul has also been featured on World Net Daily, The Drudge Report, and Huffington Post. As an author, Paul has written four prophetic books, Hosea Prophecy, Texas Blood Lake, Mark of the Beast RFID, and Zombie Apocalypse. Paul is currently working on Jerusalem Jihad which he plans on completing after returning from his journey to Jerusalem in May this year.

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/may-6-pastor-paul-begley/


JIHAD IN TEXAS!

Texas ShootingCommentary Analysis

by

L. A. Marzulli

It said that “two soldiers of the caliphate” carried out the attack at a conference centre near Dallas.

The IS’s al-Bayan Radio news bulletin said that the exhibition “was portraying negative pictures of the Prophet Muhammad”.

Both suspects were shot dead after opening fire at the centre on Sunday.

Correspondents say that it is believed to be the first time that IS has claimed to have carried out an attack in the US.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-32589546#%22

Yesterday two jihadist’s were shot dead as they attempted to kill as many people as possible in the controversial Mohammed Cartoon drawing contest.

First off.  The organizers of this so-called contest know full well that they are engaged in baiting Moslems to come and defend their prophet.  This is, in some ways analogous to Christians reacting to the blasphemous so-called art work named, Piss-Christ, which is a photo of a crucifix submerged in the artists urine.  This photo really ticks me off and I am deeply offended by it and have commented on it before on this Blog.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piss_Christ

However, I’m not going off on a Jihad, grabbing my twelve gauge, and heading to the art museum to shoot this knuckle-head who is looking for a reaction.  The guy needs prayer.  Is this what turning the other cheek is about?

This cartoon contest, held in Texas, where the contestants were to draw the prophet Mohammed, was in response to the Charlie Hebdrow fiasco, in France that left 12 dead, as the crazed gunmen—jihadist’s—shouted the usual, Allah Akbar as they massacred unarmed people.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/paris-magazine-attack/charlie-hebdo-shooting-12-killed-muhammad-cartoons-magazine-paris-n281266

Did they bait Moslems by holding this contest and describing it as an exercise in free speech?  As I pointed out above, with the reference to the Piss-Christ photo; just as this photo is insulting to me as a Christian, the Mohammed cartoon contest would be deeply insulting to Moslems who are forbidden to represent Mohammed in any type of art-work, by just such a contest.

However, the response of the Jihadist’s, was over the top crazy and that’s where we have a problem much greater than the media is letting on too.

How many radical Moslems are already living in the USA?  How many will resort to violence when pushed?  How many are all to willing to die for Allah?  How many Major Hassan’s—The Fort Hood Shooter—are living amongst us?

The take-away for me is this.  There is a cultural disparity between Moslems and other Americans.  Most Moslems are law biding people, however, there are those in the Moslem community that despise our way of life, our freedoms, our liberty, our sense of humor, our cultural expression, and in essence everything about us.

Every Friday in Iran, thousands gather and chant, Death to America!  Death to Israel!  So much for, can’t we all just get along…

In closing todays post.  Radical Islam is residing in our country.  The two men who were shot in Texas were willing to die as martyrs for Allah.  How many more of these guys are here?  How will we know who to trust?  We should ban immigration of people from countries that harbor terrorists.  However, the dummies in control immigration in Washington, don’t have the backbone or gumption to do so.  At some point Americans are going to say enough.  Look what is happening in the UK and we can get a feel of what is coming here….the Islamization of America.

Now for a limited time only, you can get all of the watchers DVD’s (Watchers 1 – 8), Further Evidence, On the Trail of the Nephilim Calendar and a free 1 month subscription to my online newsletter!

 

$190.00 + sh

$99.00 + sh

Go to www.lamarzulli.net

*Additional shipping fee on International shipping may apply

Watchers-Set

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

L. A. 2013 PHOTO 23

January 16 17 – Prophecy Conference California – with Chuck Missler Bob Cornuke! Details soon! Church of the Rock – Riverside California! http://www.rockchurchsr.org/CONFERENCE.html
March 12-15: Lion Heart Ministries in Knoxville Tennessee.  http://www.lionheartministries.org/calendar_conf_NephilimAgenda.php
March 15th: LA Marzulli will minister at Lakewind Church’s Sunday morning service (the conference venue – see above link).
March 18th: Calvary Chapel East Albuquerque

March 20: Farmington – Dine’s Baptist Church 3396 Hwy 62 – Waterflow NM

April 16 – 19:  Northeast Prophecy Summit – http://www.northeastprophecysummit.org/

 April 21! UPARS – Studio City – Los Angeles – Studio City at 12355 Moorpark Ave., 91604. http://www.meetup.com/UPARS-Los-Angeles/

April 24-26: Memphis Tennessee – http://www.watchersconference.com

April 28h: Nashville! https://www.eventbrite.com/e/invasion-featuring-guest-authorlecturer-la-marzulli-tickets-15929991032

May 1-3 : Calvary Chapel Kennebec Valley located in Fairfield Maine!  www.cckennebecvalley.org

September 12: Nephilm Mounds III – Russ Dizdar, Gary Stearman, Chief Joseph Riverwind Fritz Zimmerman, L. A. Marzulli!   http://www.nephilimmounds3.com

Just Added! September 19th – Prophecy Conference – Details soon

Just Added!  October 23-26 – Atlanta – www.freedomslightchurchofgod.org 

To book L. A. Marzulli please email him at la@lamarzulli.net 

L. A. Marzulli shares the platform with a variety of speakers with many different world views. Marzulli does not endorse anyones world view unless specifically noted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About these ads

Article source: https://lamarzulli.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/jihad-in-texas/


Charlie Hebdo editor warns western media: “We can’t be the only ones to stand up for these values”

He said this on Friday, 48 hours before last night’s attempted reprise of the Paris massacre in Dallas. This can’t be repeated enough: This guy is famous and his colleagues are dead only because the entirety of western media refuses to spread the risk of attack by publishing cartoons of Mohammed themselves. They painted the bullseye on Charlie Hebdo for jihadis by their refusal. And more often than not, they can’t muster the dignified contrition needed to admit that’s what they’ve done. Instead they congratulate themselves on being extorted into silence by dressing it up as “sensitivity” to Muslims.

I wonder if that’s not what’s driving the backlash among the literati to PEN’s decision to give Charlie Hebdo an award. There may be some vestigial feeling of shame here that they’ve placed the full weight of their profession’s duty to defend western free speech from jihadi intimidation on one goofy left-wing French satirical magazine. One way to cope with the guilt from having wronged someone is to convince yourself that the one you’ve wronged is worthy of being despised. Having abandoned Charlie Hebdo to its fate, maybe it eases these turds’ collective conscience to tell themselves now that the magazine is irredeemably racist, a tool of the privileged against poor Muslims. The jihadis can’t be excused for the massacre but maybe Joyce Carol Oates can be excused, in her own mind at least, for not rushing to help such a noxious publication shoulder the load for civilization.

The film critic said it’s important for journalists and ordinary citizens not to self-censor and, staking an absolutist position​, said: “We don’t negotiate. There’s either freedom of speech or there is not.”

But Biard said the magazine, which printed nearly 8 million copies of its first post-massacre edition – up from its usual 60,000 – cannot continue its bold exercise of free expression alone, and warned Western journalists they risk emboldening jihadis by avoiding sensitive topics, such as depicting Muhammad, and marginalizing those who do.

Many publications, he said, “turned their back” on Charlie Hebdo by questioning the appropriateness of pillorying religious fanatics.

“The press suffer a lack of courage in this matter,” he said. “We don’t want to be a symbol any longer. … We can’t be the only ones to stand up for these values.”

How would the literati split on Charlie Hebdo if it was a right-wing satirical mag? PEN has refused to back down to liberal dissenters who say the magazine’s unworthy of an award but that’s made relatively easy by the fact that CH is itself unabashedly left. Charb, its murdered former editor, described it a few years ago as left-wing, secularist, and atheist in orientation; even the “racist” cartoons are better understood as absurdist satires on racist perspectives. There’s a clash of values in the PEN debate — free speech in the right to draw Mohammed versus protecting the disenfranchised by discouraging mockery of them — but that debate is between two values the left claims for itself. What if instead the cartoons of Mohammed were intended not just to vindicate free speech under threat but to mock Mohammed sincerely as a contemptible figure and the religion he founded as dangerous, a la the Pam Geller event last night? Would PEN still want to give Charlie Hebdo an award? It should. Defending the right to blaspheme is an increasingly lonely, dangerous business, whatever the motives. But would it?

For what it’s worth, by the way, I’m glad Charlie Hebdo seems to be getting out of the Mohammed trade. If our press corps is going to bow to jihadi extortion, it’s probably better in the long run if there are no mainstream outliers whatsoever. When there’s an outlier, like CH, people can delude themselves that there’s not as much intimidation as they think, that the images they’re curious about are still publicly available, albeit in an obscure French weekly that operates as a sort of samizdat, and therefore there’s not really a crisis of free speech in the west. Let’s eliminate the outlier and face the crisis directly. No more excuses.

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/04/charlie-hebdo-editor-warns-western-media-we-cant-be-the-only-ones-to-stand-up-for-these-values/


Civil war: Alan Grayson rips into national Democratic Party ‘bosses’

There’s new from the front in the civil war that we dare not call by its name.

It seems as though the Democratic Party’s campaign committees learned nothing from the tea party backlash against the Republican Party. They appear to be eagerly repeating the GOP’s mistakes.

Following Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) decision to leave office after a single term in the upper chamer of Congress, Democrats are gearing up for a competitive race for an open swing state U.S. Senate seat. For weeks, it appeared as though the party was prepared to back moderate Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-FL) as their Sunshine State senatorial nominee. On Monday, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee made it official.

“Patrick Murphy is one of our party’s most promising rising stars, and his track record of fighting for Florida’s working families, seniors, and the environment make him the strongest candidate to win the Florida Senate race and flip this seat,” said DSCC Chair Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT) in a statement announcing the committee’s decision to back Murphy.

That has apparently not dissuaded the outspoken progressive Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) from challenging Murphy in a primary. On Monday, the firebrand liberal House member and his supporters issued a series of blistering condemnations of the DSCC.

“Florida Democratic voters choose our party nominee, not out-of-touch party bosses sipping cognac in a smoke-filled room in Washington, DC.,” Grayson tells the Tampa Bay Times in an email. “As I said before, I am probably going to run for the Senate.”

And here is Susan Smith, president of the Democratic Progressive Caucus of Florida:

“Progressives are the heart and soul of the Democratic Party in Florida and across the nation. We are the volunteers who stuff envelopes, knock on doors, and provide the grassroots energy that powers successful Democratic campaigns. The idea that a senator from Montana and Wall Street Democrats know better than rank-and-file Florida Democrats is both patronizing and unsurprising. Then again, no one knows better than Jon Tester that DSCC support doesn’t mean a whole lot.

Though Grayson is even a bit too extreme for many progressives, particularly those in a perfectly purple state like Florida, the DSCC risks alienating its base of liberal supporters by cementing the impression that it is unduly favorable toward “establishment” candidates.

The same dynamic is at play in the nascent primary race to replace retiring Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD). In the Old Line State, Democratic Party power brokers have expressed their support for former DCCC chairman and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), but progressive favorite Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD) is hoping to thwart the ambitions of her party’s leaders. In March, Edwards announced that she would defy powerful Democrats like Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and challenge Van Hollen in the primary.

In a variety of statements to the press, Edwards’ progressive supporters likened her views to those of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and suggested that backing a white man to replace one of the Senate’s longest serving female members would be an insult.

The Democratic Party might be playing with fire by backing electable moderates for the U.S. Senate, although the party’s progressive insurgency is less pronounced than the tea party movement was prior to the 2010 cycle. While it would compel the press to use verboten terms like “civil war” to describe the emerging chaotic dynamic that will dominate the Democratic Party’s primary process, it would be still be worth it for reporters to monitor this cover this phenomenon with fervor. The president’s party is becoming pretty interesting, even if you’d never know it from the new media’s coverage.

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/04/civil-war-alan-grayson-rips-into-national-democratic-party-bosses/


Bill Clinton’s defense of the Clintons is the best they have to offer

In the wake of increasingly problematic questions about the Clinton Foundation and its various fundraising charity endeavors, no one is surprised that the basically unopposed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is not addressing questions. She’s— how shall we say?— terrible at that. She’s supposed to bumble through answers, evade badly, charmlessly elide, and be wholly unrelatable.

But you know who’s not supposed to be terrible? Bill Clinton. He’s gifted. He’s smarter. He’s charming. And, this is the best he has to offer on questions about the Foundation.

“There is no doubt in my mind that we have never done anything knowingly inappropriate in terms of taking money to influence any kind of American government policy. That just hasn’t happened.”

Convincing.

“I don’t think that I did anything that was against the interest of the United States.”

You don’t think?

“Do you understand though that the perception itself is a problem?” McFadden asked.

“No,” Clinton replied. “I’m not responsible for anybody else’s perception.”

Well, that takes care of that.

And, finally:

“I gotta pay the bills.”

They’re broke, don’tcha know? This probably helps:

That last prompted a bad reaction from Chris Cillizza, not least of all because it’s reminiscent of Hillary’s “broke” gaffe:

Here’s the thing: I am sure the Clintons have big bills, as any couple would who live a lifestyle anything like theirs. But no one wants to hear about the big bills of a couple likely worth hundreds of millions of dollars. (Bill Clinton made $105 million from paid speaking gigs alone between 2001 and 2013.) It just doesn’t sit well. And it makes any attempt to portray Hillary as a “regular person” that much harder.

There’s no question that Bill Clinton can be an asset to his wife’s campaign. But as we saw in 2008, he can also be a problem — if he comes across as angry, self-pitying and out-of-touch. This NBC interview tilts in the latter direction more than anyone in Clintonworld would like to see.

This is the best they have to offer with the best messenger they have. No wonder Hillary’s not taking questions. She continues to benefit from not having a big competitor, but Bill’s performance doesn’t bode well for what her campaign will have to offer once it really does have to answer question on this drip-drip-drip story of cronyism and corruption.

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/04/bill-clintons-defense-of-the-clintons-is-the-best-they-have-to-offer/


May 4- Captain Jerry Flynn

Captain Jerry Flynn Retired Canadian Armed Forces Captain. Spent 22 of 26+ years’ service in Signals Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Radio Warfare Executive Officer (2-i/c) Operations Officer at ultra-sensitive radio station directly employing 200+ radio operators technicians; worked National Defense Headquarters, in the Directorate of Electronic Warfare, Conducted EW operations at sea with RCN and on land with NATO, has been an outspoken critic of wireless technologies and the dangers they pose to humanity. In addition he is alerting the masses to the dangers of smart meters and smart grid technologies.

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/may-4-captain-jerry-flynn/


May 4- Captain Jerry Flynn

Captain Jerry Flynn Retired Canadian Armed Forces Captain. Spent 22 of 26+ years’ service in Signals Intelligence, Electronic Warfare and Radio Warfare Executive Officer (2-i/c) Operations Officer at ultra-sensitive radio station directly employing 200+ radio operators technicians; worked National Defense Headquarters, in the Directorate of Electronic Warfare, Conducted EW operations at sea with RCN and on land with NATO, has been an outspoken critic of wireless technologies and the dangers they pose to humanity. In addition he is alerting the masses to the dangers of smart meters and smart grid technologies.

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/may-4-captain-jerry-flynn/


May 5- Dr. Tom Horn

Renowned best selling prophecy author Tom Horn, from Skywatch TV,  is a well known radio personality who has guest-hosted and appeared on dozens of radio and television shows over the last 30 years, including “The 700 Club” and “Coast to Coast AM.” When looking for a spokesperson to promote their film “Deceived” staring Louis Gossett Jr. and Judd Nelson, “Cloud 10 Pictures” selected Thomas as their spokesperson to explain the Christian viewpoint on UFO-related demonology.

He joins Sheila to talk about his latest book ‘On the Path of the Immortals’.

MAY SPECIAL- DISCOUNTED BOOK BUNDLE LIMITED TIME OFFER

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/may-5-dr-tom-horn/


May 5- Dr. Tom Horn

Renowned best selling prophecy author Tom Horn, from Skywatch TV,  is a well known radio personality who has guest-hosted and appeared on dozens of radio and television shows over the last 30 years, including “The 700 Club” and “Coast to Coast AM.” When looking for a spokesperson to promote their film “Deceived” staring Louis Gossett Jr. and Judd Nelson, “Cloud 10 Pictures” selected Thomas as their spokesperson to explain the Christian viewpoint on UFO-related demonology.

He joins Sheila to talk about his latest book ‘On the Path of the Immortals’.

MAY SPECIAL- DISCOUNTED BOOK BUNDLE LIMITED TIME OFFER

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/may-5-dr-tom-horn/


L. A. Marzulli on Capricorn Radio!

L. A. Marzulli on Capricorn Radio!

Posted by lamarzulli on May 4, 2015

BREAKING NEWS!!!!

TWO JIHADISTS SHOT DEAD AT TEXAS MOHAMMED CARTOON EXHIBIT!

http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/03/us/mohammed-drawing-contest-shooting/index.html 

Now for a limited time only, you can get all of the watchers DVD’s (Watchers 1 – 8), Further Evidence, On the Trail of the Nephilim Calendar and a free 1 month subscription to my online newsletter!

 

$190.00 + sh

$99.00 + sh

Go to www.lamarzulli.net

*Additional shipping fee on International shipping may apply

Watchers-Set

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

L. A. 2013 PHOTO 23

January 16 17 – Prophecy Conference California – with Chuck Missler Bob Cornuke! Details soon! Church of the Rock – Riverside California! http://www.rockchurchsr.org/CONFERENCE.html
March 12-15: Lion Heart Ministries in Knoxville Tennessee.  http://www.lionheartministries.org/calendar_conf_NephilimAgenda.php
March 15th: LA Marzulli will minister at Lakewind Church’s Sunday morning service (the conference venue – see above link).
March 18th: Calvary Chapel East Albuquerque

March 20: Farmington – Dine’s Baptist Church 3396 Hwy 62 – Waterflow NM

April 16 – 19:  Northeast Prophecy Summit – http://www.northeastprophecysummit.org/

 April 21! UPARS – Studio City – Los Angeles – Studio City at 12355 Moorpark Ave., 91604. http://www.meetup.com/UPARS-Los-Angeles/

April 24-26: Memphis Tennessee – http://www.watchersconference.com

April 28h: Nashville! https://www.eventbrite.com/e/invasion-featuring-guest-authorlecturer-la-marzulli-tickets-15929991032

May 1-3 : Calvary Chapel Kennebec Valley located in Fairfield Maine!  www.cckennebecvalley.org

September 12: Nephilm Mounds III – Russ Dizdar, Gary Stearman, Chief Joseph Riverwind Fritz Zimmerman, L. A. Marzulli!   http://www.nephilimmounds3.com

Just Added! September 19th – Prophecy Conference – Details soon

Just Added!  October 23-26 – Atlanta – www.freedomslightchurchofgod.org 

To book L. A. Marzulli please email him at la@lamarzulli.net 

L. A. Marzulli shares the platform with a variety of speakers with many different world views. Marzulli does not endorse anyones world view unless specifically noted

About these ads

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Article source: https://lamarzulli.wordpress.com/2015/05/04/l-a-marzulli-on-capricorn-radio/


Bernie Sanders leads Dem field of Hillary challengers in fundraising with… $1.5M

As you may have heard, Vermont Senator and Democratic Socialist Bernie Sanders is running for president, and that means that he’ll need to raise some money. We learned this week that he did just that, offering potential supporters the chance to toss him a few bucks and to make history… one way or the other. I’ll confess that even I was a bit surprised to see that he pulled in a million and a half out of the gate.

Advisers to Bernie Sanders have argued that his grassroots network of small-dollar donors could raise him the roughly $50 million the independent senator from Vermont will need to run a credible, competitive campaign in the Democratic presidential primaries.

They may be right.

On Friday, the Sanders campaign announced that it has raised more than $1.5 million online in the 24 hours since he announced his candidacy. It is a surprisingly heavy haul for a candidate whom some in the Democratic chattering class have cast off as a gadfly and viewed as unable to wrest the nomination from the overwhelming favorite, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

While hardly record breaking, that’s really not a bad haul considering Sanders’ complete lack of viability. (And I’d say the same thing even if Hillary wasn’t running.) But let’s also keep in mind that it’s only remarkable because of the small period of time on the clock. If he keeps that up for even a week we might take a fresh look at it, but it will be a tall order. Ted Cruz locked down something in the range of $8M in the first week and has been going strong since then. The rest of the GOP field has been filling envelopes and lining up donor commitments steadily, which is what counts.

In the specific case of Sanders, we also have to match it up against his only known opponent. Hillary Clinton hasn’t even released her first fundraising figures, but they estimate that they’re on track to bank around $2.5B (that’s “billion” with a “b”) before this is all said and done. In reality, $1.5M isn’t even enough to launch a Senate race these days in a mildly competitive state. To even scratch the surface of a serious national bid, Sanders would have to duplicate this feat day in and day out for at least the next month, if not more.

And yet, the media seems to love a good Sanders story. Even Maxwell Tani at Business Insider was willing to throw Bernie some ink in praise of the initial fundraising surge.

“This is a remarkable start for Bernie’s campaign,” Sanders adviser Tad Devine said in a statement. “People across America are yearning for authentic leadership that tells them the truth about what is holding back our nation.”

If Democratic history is any guide, Sanders’ fundraising feat doesn’t mean he’s any closer to the nomination. In the 2004 presidential race, for example, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean (D) stunned primary-watchers by raising millions online from small donors, but flamed out early.

Is it just me, or are there a number of people in the media who seem to be bending over backward trying to make Sanders’ bid seem more legitimate? There are two different schools of thought to explain this, depending on who it is doing the advertising at any given moment. Hillary’s many supporters in the media like the Sanders story because, first, they know that Sanders isn’t a real threat. But second, they absolutely hate the media narrative that Clinton is receiving yet another coronation in the primary – as she did in her New York Senate run – and that it damages her to not have an opponent to sharpen her skills on.

For the rest of the media, Sanders has the potential to take what is otherwise a mind numbingly boring primary race which is a ratings snoozer and turn it into something a bit more interesting and potentially click-worthy. The avowed socialist holds all sorts of views which are so radical that he would immediately drive hordes of even left leaning moderate voters away from the polls in droves in the general election. Having him on the stump in the primary will at least offer the possibility of some Left Side Whacko Bird comments which they could then run and ask Hillary to comment on.

So while the world is not in any pressing danger of a Sanders presidency, politics is a game of spectacle and we can always use something new for a good headline. What the heck. Go Bernie Go!

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/02/bernie-sanders-leads-dem-field-of-hillary-challengers-in-fundraising-with-1-5m/


Scott Walker soon to be toppled in #Searsgate

You can’t have a Republican candidate for president without having some scandals attached to them. This is pretty much Political Journalism 101. Of course, this holds true for Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker as much as the rest of them, and the press has dutifully uncovered one scandal after another. And as Professor Jacobson points out at Legal Insurrection, this latest one is sure to take him down.

It seems that attacks on Scott Walker seem to boomerang and simply add to his political persona of being a regular guy.

Did you hear the one about how Scott Walker never graduated college? #Fail.

The latest attack on Walker is that he has “up to” $50,000 in credit card debt to — wait for it — Sears.

We don’t know exactly how much because financial disclosures only are made in broad ranges, so it could be as little as $10,000.

Regardless, it’s SEARS!

Yep. It’s confirmed. As reported by the New York Daily News, Governor Walker does indeed have a Sears credit card and… (wait for it again) he has an outstanding balance on it. This clearly means that he’s not a fiscal conservative.

“Owe, no!

2016 hopeful Scott Walker has tens of thousands of dollars in credit card debt, owing money to a list of banks and stores including Sears and Barclays, a new report alleges.”

There you have it. Walker carries a balance on his Sears card. We don’t know how much it is… it could be $10K or $50k. But this is a verified, real reporter documented, printed on fishwrap fact, people! Why he might not have paid off the card entirely is pointed out by the Daily Beast, as Jacobson found. He has two kids in college, his parents live with him and he has a mortgage on his house. His net worth is the lowest of any candidate, coming in at a whopping $72.5K.

Wait a minute… I thought evil, rich Republicans were the problem because of income inequality and the inability to relate to real Americans with modest incomes and debt. Wouldn’t this actually make him a good candidate? Apparently not. It just means he’s not a fiscal conservative. And by that measure, there’s probably only about 40,000 fiscal conservatives in the entire country.

Maybe it’s a signal that he has poor judgement? I mean, how did he wind up having that card in the first place? But wait… I may have the answer. Walker was probably bullied into signing up for a Sears card. After all, that’s what Ed used to do for a living.

This is the difference between meaningful debate and a throw anything at the wall media blitz. There are actually conservatives who have taken issue with Walker. They may not agree with or trust his position on issues of importance to them. That’s fine. It’s why have primaries. But this white noise coming from the press is just getting boring at this point. Call us when you find an actual scandal.

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/02/scott-walker-soon-to-be-toppled-in-searsgate/


Will the Pope declare that the Earth has “rights” this year?

Wesley Smith at National Review Online caught my attention while I was down here at Right Online with this piece on the question of nature rights.

The nature rights movement is real and extremely subversive to human freedom and thriving.

Most people think such a thing can never happen. But it already is happening. Bolivia and Ecuador have legalized the rights of nature, as have more than 30 U.S. cities, including Santa Monica. Moreover, the Secretary General of the UN, Ban-ki Moon has declared his support.

Smith is referring to an article at Commonweal which discusses the Pope’s upcoming encyclical and expectations that he may address the issue of climate change. For Smith’s part, he argues against such a move coming from the Vatican as it would cause a great schism because it would shatter the RCC’s intense focus on the unique dignity of man. I’ll leave that question for Ed, who is far more well versed on the habits and thinking of the Holy See than I ever will be. But Papal policy aside, there are some more general concerns about such a policy which should resonate with the layman.

Here’s some more from Commonweal.

When Pope Francis issues his encyclical on the environment this spring or early summer, some American Catholics will welcome it—but only some. Broadly speaking, Catholic opinion on climate change matches the American political spectrum, and thus the polemics around this polarizing issue are Catholic polemics as well. As numerous recent articles make clear, Francis is concerned about global warning. Catholics who oppose policies meant to halt or ameliorate climate change—Catholic climate skeptics—grant the pope’s authority in the moral realm, but dispute his expertise in climate science. Some have not hesitated to call him out on his views, at times harshly. One called Francis imprudent and apocalyptic; another said he was “an ally of the far left,” a “Marxist” who has been “snookered” by climate-change ideologues.

I suppose it all comes down to whether or not you believe that each and every word written or spoken by each and every Pope is the equivalent of text straight out of the bible or the Word of God. But historically it hasn’t been all that uncommon for at least some sectors of the faithful to disagree with the Papacy, though sometimes it takes a while for the message to get through. This is particularly true when discussing more “modern” matters of science or technology which were likely not thought much about – or even heard of – in biblical times. The case of Galileo comes to mind, and even the Vatican eventually came around on that one. The question of anthropogenic global warming might be a bit beyond the depth of His Holiness unless he’s receive some direct guidance from above to which we’re not privy.

But even beyond questions of Papal omniscience, we can observe this particular debate and return to the perennial question of whether or not “rights” can ever be assigned anywhere except to human beings. Whether you’re talking about ancient Greek philosophers or 20th century judicial findings, “rights” have traditionally been a fairly anthropocentric concept. We could spend the rest of the evening debating the relevance of noting that that the Earth, along with all its plants and animals, were a gift to man from God and, as such, should be treated as a precious thing. (Fair enough) But that still does not, as I read it, provide a sufficient ramp to make the jump from there to the point of saying that the government created by man should assign court-enforceable rights to creation.

Of course, now that I get to that point of the mental railroad tracks, it almost seems like I’m circling back around. I’ll toss it over to the readers to lend their insight.

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/02/will-the-pope-declare-that-the-earth-has-rights-this-year/


May 1- Dr. Ron Paul

Sheila | April 28, 2015

April 29- Nathan Leal

Watchman Nathan Leal, who has received many prophetic visions from God, uncovers his research on Jade Helm and the…

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/may-1-dr-ron-paul/


Isaiah 17 – Brick by Brick?

 SyriaCommentary Analysis

by

L. A. Marzulli

 

Syria 2Isaiah 17: Damascus will become a ruinous heap…

http://www.jpost.com/International/Bashar-al-Assads-military-forces-are-on-the-the-verge-of-collapse-400800

 The Syrian Army, faced with low morale, internal divisions and rapidly decreasing popularity, is facing its most serious challenges since the start of the four-year long Syrian Civil War that has claimed the lives of more 200,000 people.

The Isaiah 17, prophecy has never been fulfilled.  In fact, it has been collecting dust for hundreds of years as Damascus is the oldest inhabited city on the planet.

With the advent of the Arab Spring, starting in 2010 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring the Middle East saw the toppling of the governments of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt.  The unrest exploded in Syria and so far the president of Syria, Bashar al Assad, has withstood almost 5 years of a very bloody civil war.

With the race riots in Baltimore consuming most Americans attention, the situation in Syria is not on the radar of most of us, however, the tenuousness of the civil war, has not lapsed.  I’d be willing to bet most Americans could not locate Syria on a map and even more Americans could care less about what happens thousands of miles away in a country they most likely will never visit.

When we read the prophecy of Isaiah 17, which informs us that at some point Damascus will be destroyed, we can envision bombs going off, or even a tactical nuclear weapon.  However, as we look at the pictures above, it would seem Damascus is being destroyed brick by brick.

Who would have imagined the savior of the world being born in a stable?  Who could have imagined the crucifixion?  Who could have foretold how The Most High God would bless Abraham and Sarah when they were far beyond the years of childbearing?  Who could have seen the ingathering of the Jews from all over the world, after the devastation of the Holocaust, which would result in the birth of Israel…. fulfilling ancient prophecies.

In closing todays post:  We see through a glass darkly.   In other words we know from the prophetic literature that Damascus will be destroyed, but the text isn’t clear on how this will be accomplished.  Are we seeing the fulfillment of this prophecy happening in front of us now?  At this point in time, I’m beginning to wonder, as there seems to be no let-up in the bloody civil war that has claimed the lives of over 250,000 people.  Certain sections of Damascus are, a ruinous heap.

One thing I know for sure:  What was written will come to pass.  What was foretold will unfold!

May 1-3 : Calvary Chapel Kennebec Valley located in Fairfield Maine!  www.cckennebecvalley.org

We will be hosting L. A. Marzulli for the following sessions:

Friday, May 1, 2015

Session 1: 6-8PM – On the trail of the Nephilim

Saturday, May 2, 2015

Session 2: 10AM-12PM – As in the days of Noah

Session 3: 2-4PM – Geo-politics Biblical Prophecy
Session 4: 6-8PM – Odds Ends

Attendance of four sessions are included for one person. $50.00

Now for a limited time only, you can get all of the watchers DVD’s (Watchers 1 – 8), Further Evidence, On the Trail of the Nephilim Calendar and a free 1 month subscription to my online newsletter!

 

$190.00 + sh

$99.00 + sh

Go to www.lamarzulli.net

*Additional shipping fee on International shipping may apply

Watchers-Set

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

L. A. 2013 PHOTO 23

January 16 17 – Prophecy Conference California – with Chuck Missler Bob Cornuke! Details soon! Church of the Rock – Riverside California! http://www.rockchurchsr.org/CONFERENCE.html
March 12-15: Lion Heart Ministries in Knoxville Tennessee.  http://www.lionheartministries.org/calendar_conf_NephilimAgenda.php
March 15th: LA Marzulli will minister at Lakewind Church’s Sunday morning service (the conference venue – see above link).
March 18th: Calvary Chapel East Albuquerque

March 20: Farmington – Dine’s Baptist Church 3396 Hwy 62 – Waterflow NM

April 16 – 19:  Northeast Prophecy Summit – http://www.northeastprophecysummit.org/

 April 21! UPARS – Studio City – Los Angeles – Studio City at 12355 Moorpark Ave., 91604. http://www.meetup.com/UPARS-Los-Angeles/

April 24-26: Memphis Tennessee – http://www.watchersconference.com

April 28h: Nashville! https://www.eventbrite.com/e/invasion-featuring-guest-authorlecturer-la-marzulli-tickets-15929991032

May 1-3 : Calvary Chapel Kennebec Valley located in Fairfield Maine!  www.cckennebecvalley.org

September 12: Nephilm Mounds III – Russ Dizdar, Gary Stearman, Chief Joseph Riverwind Fritz Zimmerman, L. A. Marzulli!   http://www.nephilimmounds3.com

Just Added! September 19th – Prophecy Conference – Details soon

Just Added!  October 23-26 – Atlanta – www.freedomslightchurchofgod.org 

To book L. A. Marzulli please email him at la@lamarzulli.net 

L. A. Marzulli shares the platform with a variety of speakers with many different world views. Marzulli does not endorse anyones world view unless specifically noted

About these ads

Article source: https://lamarzulli.wordpress.com/2015/05/01/isaiah-17-brick-by-brick/


Clever new Rubio amendment to Corker’s Iran bill: The final deal must match this month’s WH “fact sheet”

You remember the “fact sheet,” don’t you? That’s the document the White House released on April 2nd, the day it reached a “framework” deal with Iran, describing the terms that Iran had allegedly agreed to. Snap nuclear inspections of all suspicious sites, a greatly reduced number of centrifuges, delayed sanctions relief until Iran satisfied its denuclearization obligations — it wasn’t half bad, and certainly better than what an Obama skeptic might have expected. The only problem: Apparently no one told Iran that this is the deal they had agreed to. Within a week, Iran’s supreme leader claimed the U.S. “fact sheet” was full of lies; Iran’s defense minister claimed the deal didn’t include inspection of military sites; and, most dramatically, Iran’s president claimed that all sanctions would need to be lifted on day one after a final deal, not gradually as Iran complied with its duties under the deal. Either Iran had suddenly gotten cold feet after the “framework” deal was struck and reneged on what it had promised John Kerry or … the “fact sheet” was itself filled with distortions about what Iran had actually agreed to, a political ploy designed to build support in the U.S. for a deal that was still secretly very much in flux.

Doesn’t matter which is true, says Marco Rubio. The White House gave us the “fact sheet.” They told us that Iran had agreed to those terms. Those terms should therefore be absolutely essential provisions in any final deal. If the White House is uncomfortable with that, it can only be because either (a) they lied on the “fact sheet” or (b) they told the truth but are prepared to cave to whatever new demands Iran’s come up with to wriggle free of its previously agreed-to obligations. In other words, Rubio’s going to make Obama and/or Iran live up to their own BS.

Rubio’s amendment simply quotes that fact sheet verbatim and says the president may not waive or lift any Congressional sanctions until he certifies Iran has met the White House conditions.

“For the life of me, I don’t understand why that would be controversial,” Rubio said Wednesday. “Yet somehow, I was told this would box the White House in.”…

Rubio’s fact-sheet amendment is different [from other GOP amendments]. It doesn’t challenge the presidential authority to sign an executive agreement. Republicans supported that power when their party controlled the White House. Rubio’s fact-sheet amendment is also germane to the Iran legislation before the Senate. An argument used against other amendments–like Rubio’s one on recognizing Israel–is that it asks Iran to meet conditions not related to the nuclear negotiations.

Rubio’s fact sheet amendment only asks Democrats to vote on whether a final Iran deal should meet the conditions as described by the leader of their own party. If Democrats vote that it should, then Obama may be forced to issue a veto over his own fact sheet as he seeks to make a final agreement more palatable to Iran. If the Democrats vote that it shouldn’t, then they will appear to be conceding the White House either misled the public or bungled the negotiations earlier this month.

It’s a clever tactic by a guy who, I think, has a knack for clever tactics. But … does it have a chance of ending up in the final Corker-written Senate bill on Iran? Obama can only be boxed in if Congress passes the bill with Rubio’s amendment attached, and the odds of that happening seem, shall we say, modest. The takeaway from my earlier post about his amendment on Israel is that there’s a strong bipartisan consensus in the Senate, backed by none other than AIPAC, that’s determined to protect Corker’s bill as written by defeating any amendments that might split the bipartisan coalition of senators that are currently lined up behind it. Rubio’s amendment could do that. If it ended up passing, Democrats would probably vote no on the final bill to prevent the “fact sheet” from tying Obama’s hands during the final negotiations with Iran, even though O himself claims Iran already agreed to everything in it. Without those Democratic votes, the bill would fail and Congress would be left with nothing. In theory that would supply the GOP with a nice talking point about the bill’s defeat — “Senate Dems were afraid to make Obama live up to his own rhetoric” — but in practice there are various RINOs who would likely give Democrats political cover by voting with them to kill Rubio’s amendment. For some Republicans, like Corker and Lindsey Graham, the most important thing is to pass some sort of bill that would grant Congress a vote on the final deal, even if it means sacrificing each and every amendment that might potentially inconvenience President Precious in his negotiations.

All of which is to say, how you feel about Rubio’s amendment depends mainly on how you feel about Corker’s bill. There’s no denying, as Ace says, that it’s a sham: Even if a bunch of Democrats join with the GOP now to pass it, guaranteeing a vote on the final deal with Iran this summer, it’s a cinch that at least 34 Senate Dems will vote yes when the time comes to approve that deal, ensuring that it’ll take effect. There’s no way they’ll stab Obama in the back on his greatest foreign policy “achievement” by helping the GOP to block it, which means all the talk of “bipartisanship” right now is, to borrow Ace’s phrase, “failure theater.” It’s bipartisan only as long as it doesn’t create headaches for Obama during negotiations; once it does, as Rubio’s amendment threatens to do, Democrats will go back to voting a (mostly) party line. The whole process is a kabuki designed to make it look like Republicans are doing something meaningful to stop the deal with Iran when in reality it’s entirely up to Reid’s Democrats whether it ends up being blocked or not. The only thing that hinges on whether the Senate passes Corker’s bill is the sort of spin available to the GOP later once the deal with Iran is implemented. If Corker’s bill passes now, setting up a vote later on the final Iran deal, and that final deal draws, say, 66 “no” votes, then Republicans can say a heavy bipartisan majority of the U.S. Senate disapproved of it. If Corker’s bill doesn’t pass now, Congress will effectively remain silent on the deal, which at least has the virtue of them not engaging in a sham vote that perverts the Treaty Clause in the Constitution. Either way, the deal takes effect despite Rubio’s best laid plans. Which outcome is better?

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/30/clever-new-rubio-amendment-to-corkers-iran-bill-the-final-deal-must-match-this-months-wh-fact-sheet/


Georgetown to College Republicans: do me a kindness and edit the Christina Hoff Sommers lecture

If there’s one thing that’s true, Christine Hoff Sommers of the American Enterprise Institute invites all the trigger warnings when she comes to speak at college campuses. Oh, and she’s the harbinger of microaggressions. It’s not a problem if you don’t understand these terms; they don’t exist in the minds of serious people. In short, they’re a set of protocols by progressives to shut the debate down because heaven forbid we challenge the preconceived notions about politics to those delicate snowflakes on the left.

Last week, Ms. Sommers (in some schools, the term “Ms.” is offensive) gave a lecture at Georgetown University in Washington D.C. last week.

The Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute helped organize the event at Georgetown, and Sommers gave her lecture that lasted a little over an hour. Yet, the school administration is asking the College Republicans to edit the video of the lecture by removing footage of some of the students who raised questions at the event (via Ashe Schow):

Lauren Gagliardi, the school’s assistant director for the center for student engagement, emailed two members of the College Republicans to request they edit the video to remove students who did not agree to be videotaped.

In the email, provided to the Washington Examiner, Gagliardi tells the students that the “edited version needs to be released without students who did not give permission to be taped.” She also says that if the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute, which sponsored the event, is “unwilling or unresponsive to the request, Georgetown will need to step in.”

The video that has Gagliardi so upset features feminist activists holding up signs accusing Hoff Sommers of being an anti-feminist or deny rape.

Laurel Conrad, the lecture director for the Clare Booth Luce Policy Center, wrote in Legal Insurrection that “it stretches credulity that Georgetown and its students would not understand that the lecture was a public event. The video camera was in plain view, and audience members themselves appear to be taking video and photos. It could not shock any student that he or she was on camera.” She also noted why she understands why Georgetown is taking this position; it’s a public relations nightmare.

Schow included a statement from Clare Booth Luce Policy Center’s founder and president–Michelle Easton­–who noted that once the video was uploaded on YouTube, it’s impossible to edit.

Students help trigger warnings and directions of a “safe space” in case any attendees of Sommer’s speech caused them to feel uncomfortable. Again, is this real life?

Also, I would respect college liberals more if they would just come out and straight-up say they do not respect free speech on their respective campuses. The whole “we support free speech, but only what we view as legitimate speech” isn’t a standard. It’s not even a serious position. Nevertheless, The Hoya, Georgetown’s student newspaper, and their editorial team is just fed up with people articulating a different point of view [emphasis mine]:

The Georgetown University College Republicans hosted Christina Hoff Sommers, an author and philosophy professor known for her criticism of contemporary feminism and her disavowal of a so-called “rape myth,” last week.

By giving Sommers a platform, GUCR has knowingly endorsed a harmful conversation on the serious topic of sexual assault.

Giving voice to someone who argues that statistics on sexual assault exaggerate the problem and condemns reputable studies for engaging in “statistical hijinks” serves only to trigger obstructive dialogue and impede the progress of the university’s commitment to providing increased resources to survivors.

It is necessary and valuable to promote the free expression of a plurality of views, but this back-and-forth about whether or not certain statistics are valid is not the conversation that students should be having. Students should engage in a dialogue that focuses on establishing a safe space for survivors while at the same time tackling the root causes of sexual assault.

Inevitably, the discussion initiated by Sommers distracts from a focus on solutions. At its worst, such discourse encourages rape denialism.

This ploy to divert attention and resources from solutions and survivors has no place anywhere — especially not at Georgetown, where students are fortunate enough to participate in a community that emphasizes care for the whole person. Denying the lived experiences of survivors stands in sharp contradiction to this value.

Conversations that focus on whether or not the problem is “overstated,” rather than on how the problem can be solved, are an insult to Georgetown’s survivors and a recipe for inaction.

Rape culture is a system that thrives on silence. Students cannot allow Georgetown’s sexual assault discourse to be subdued by those who would downplay the problem at hand.

Wait, we promote free expression, BUT a debate about the validity of statistics is not “valid.” Then, you don’t support free speech. It’s the same situation with anti-gun liberals, who say they’re for the Second Amendment and respect the rights of hunters (I doubt the PA State Game Lands, which didn’t exist, were a point of contention at the 1787 Constitutional convention), and then go on to support policies that chip away at gun rights. Granted, the statements by the Hoya are rather explicit in showing that they have no clue what freedom of speech entails. Yes, you have to tolerate some insane opinion. Yes, that’s a testament to how serious you take the Bill of Rights–and yes, you can choose not to go. This is college; I’m sure there are a multitude of other activities–college liberal-approved–that are occurring when these events occur.

Last December, Slate’s Emily Yoffe had a phenomenally researched piece about rape statistics–and how they might not be as clear cut when given a second look. She also noted that the rush to prevent the spread of this “putative” epidemic on college campuses–and protect women from harm–has led to men’s rights being infringed by “misguided policies.” Gasp! Does Yoffe deserve a trigger warning too for writing something that is most certainly not a conservative publication?

Via Slate:

One campus rape is one too many. But the severe new policies championed by the White House, the Department of Education, and members of Congress are responding to the idea that colleges are in the grips of an epidemic—and the studies suggesting this epidemic don’t hold up to scrutiny. Bad policy is being made on the back of problematic research, and will continue to be unless we bring some healthy skepticism to the hard work of putting a number on the prevalence of campus rape.

It is exceedingly difficult to get a numerical handle on a crime that is usually committed in private and the victims of which—all the studies agree—frequently decline to report. A further complication is that because researchers are asking about intimate subjects, there is no consensus on the best way to phrase sensitive questions in order to get the most accurate answers. A 2008 National Institute of Justice paper on campus sexual assault explained some of the challenges: “Unfortunately, researchers have been unable to determine the precise incidence of sexual assault on American campuses because the incidence found depends on how the questions are worded and the context of the survey.” Take the National Crime Victimization Survey, the nationally representative sample conducted by the federal government to find rates of reported and unreported crime. For the years 1995 to 2011, as the University of Colorado Denver’s Rennison explained to me, it found that an estimated 0.8 percent of noncollege females age 18-24 revealed that they were victims of threatened, attempted, or completed rape/sexual assault. Of the college females that age during that same time period, approximately 0.6 percent reported they experienced such attempted or completed crime.

That finding diverges wildly from the notion that one in five college women will be sexually assaulted by the time they graduate.

The Sexual Victimization of College Women, a 2000 study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Justice, is the basis for another widely cited statistic, even grimmer than the finding of CSA: that one in four college women will be raped.

But the authors go on to make several assumptions that ratchet up the risk. The study was carried out during the spring and asked women to describe any assaults experienced during that academic year. The researchers decided to double the numbers they received from their subjects, in order to extrapolate their findings over an entire calendar year, even as they acknowledged that this was “problematic,” as students rarely attend school for 12 months. That calculation brought the incidence figure to nearly 5 percent. Although college is designed to be a four-year experience, the authors note that it takes students “an average” of five years, so they then multiplied their newly-arrived-at 5 percent of student victims by five years, and thus they conclude: “The percentage of completed or attempted rape victimization among women in higher educational institutions might climb to between one-fifth and one-quarter.”

In a footnote, the authors acknowledge that asserting that one-quarter of college students “might” be raped is not based on actual evidence: “These projections are suggestive. To assess accurately the victimization risk for women throughout a college career, longitudinal research following a cohort of female students across time is needed.” The one-fifth to one-quarter assertion would mean that young American college women are raped at a rate similar to women in Congo, where rape has been used as a weapon of war.

Now, we can debate these findings–and we should.  Even Yoffe’s colleagues at Slate said it was a great write-up on how the 1/5 and 1/4 statistics are “shaky.” Yet, the Hoya editorial board seems to think otherwise. It’s troubling when Onion satire begins to mirror real life.

As for the video being edited, it should not be edited. Yes, Sommers had her detractors in the room, but nothing especially obnoxious occurred.

Exit question: Isn’t Washington D.C. a single party consent state for video recording? If that’s the case, then Georgetown really can’t “step in” regarding the editing of a public event.

 

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/30/georgetown-to-college-republicans-do-me-a-kindness-and-edit-the-christina-hoff-sommers-lecture/


Guys, Michael Moore has some demands

Who can this country turn to in dark times, uncertain times, times of unrest, for cogent, well-formulated common-sense solutions and the inspiration to achieve them? Michael Moore, of course, as illustrated by the five-tweet rant that will save America.

First, from what position of authority does he make demands? Is he a leader of a movement of some kind? Does he have some kind of leverage I don’t know about? Is he holding someone hostage? Second, as Radley Balko points out, it seems an odd demand that only African-American nonviolent offenders be released. If one feels it’s a moral affront to imprison nonviolent drug offenders—and a surprising number of Americans, even in reddest Texas, do—why just release one race of offenders?

I do like that this rant hinges on a surprise semi-endorsement of 2nd-Amendment and self-defense from the maker of “Bowling for Columbine.” He’s got a point, there. The citizenry of this country is admirably well-armed, making one of his “demands” more possible. No thanks to him.

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/30/guys-michael-moore-has-some-demands/


April 30-Timothy Alberino

Sheila | April 28, 2015

April 29- Nathan Leal

Watchman Nathan Leal, who has received many prophetic visions from God, uncovers his research on Jade Helm and the…

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/april-30-timothy-alberino/


A& E Network Thinks America is Hungry For On Screen Adultery

AE’s fyi channel has just announced something called “Seven Year Switch,” the premise of which is that couples get bored, sexually and otherwise, seven years into their marriage and need a change. Read Full Story 

Article source: http://www.weekendvigilante.com/a-e-network-thinks-america-is-hungry-for-on-screen-adultery/


We Will NOT OBEY! Cultural Push-Back!

FGraham_PL2_Commentary Analysis

by

L. A. Marzulli

“We will not obey.”

That’s the blunt warning a group of prominent religious leaders is sending to the Supreme Court of the United States as they consider same-sex marriage.

“We respectfully warn the Supreme Court not to cross that line,” read a document titled, Pledge in Solidarity to Defend Marriage. “We stand united together in defense of marriage. Make no mistake about our resolve.” 

“While there are many things we can endure, redefining marriage is so fundamental to the natural order and the common good that this is the line we must draw and one we cannot and will not cross,” the pledge states.

“We’re sending a warning to the Supreme Court and frankly any court that crosses the line on the issue of marriage,” Staver told me.

He said that once same-sex marriage is elevated to the level of protected status – it will transform the face of society and will result in the “beginning of the end of Western Civilization.”

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/04/28/will-not-obey-christian-leaders-threaten-civil-disobedience-if-supreme-court/

I love it! Finally the church makes a stand!  This is what cultural push-back is all about.  Think about it.  The Supreme Court has  justices who are put in place by either conservative or liberal administrations.  In other words do we really think Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg won’t vote for gay marriage?  Of course she will, as will Justice Sotomayor.  The court is a stacked deck and like much of government it is manipulated by those who have a political ideology to uphold and promulgate.

The Supreme Court like Congress needs to be overhauled, as Justices are appointed for life and this means that once someone is selected and approved by Congress, they’re ideology is in place and thus if they are conservative or liberal they will most likely vote along those lines for the duration of their service.

This is the problem.  Congress makes a big deal when someone is nominated to the Supreme Court.  They essentially grill the person with hours of questions, and the media covers the proceedings.  However, the persons core values, their paradigm remains in place long after the grilling is over.  This is why the court splits along conservative or liberal lines, in a five to four split, on many issues.

First graders are now being subjected to accept transgendered children and while I understand the parents plight of the boy who thinks he’s a girl, what about the other children? http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/24/us/colorado-transgender-girl-school/ What about their rights?

It amazes me that we hear every detail about Bruce Jenner and his upcoming surgery but we don’t know how many of our soldiers were killed in Afghanistan or Iraq.  Shame on the State controlled MEDIA!

Marriage between one man and one women is, in my opinion, the bulwark of western society.  It remains the foundation of our culture.  Polygamy, pedophilia, and gay marriage are not accepted nor should they be.  While there is a segment of society that will look at the above statement and call me a homophobe, what are they defending?  Why do most Americans agree that marriage is sacrosanct and is between a man and a women, not a union between Steve and Bob, or Jill and Kate.

In closing todays post.  There is a time for push-back and I love the fact the church is waking up and drawing a line in the sand.  While I do not believe in violent protest, like we see in Baltimore and Ferguson, there is a time for civil disobedience.  There is a time to say that we will not adhere to laws that go against the core principles of what many of us hold dear.  I hope the Justices are getting the message.

Note! Thanks to everyone who came out to the conference last night!  The room was packed and I yacked for over three hours.  Thanks to Chad Karen, Jesse Jennifer, Josh Misty.  Great to see Bob Joan and Paul Paula!  

May 1-3 : Calvary Chapel Kennebec Valley located in Fairfield Maine!  www.cckennebecvalley.org

We will be hosting L. A. Marzulli for the following sessions:

Friday, May 1, 2015

Session 1: 6-8PM – On the trail of the Nephilim

Saturday, May 2, 2015

Session 2: 10AM-12PM – As in the days of Noah

Session 3: 2-4PM – Geo-politics Biblical Prophecy
Session 4: 6-8PM – Odds Ends

Attendance of four sessions are included for one person. $50.00

Now for a limited time only, you can get all of the watchers DVD’s (Watchers 1 – 8), Further Evidence, On the Trail of the Nephilim Calendar and a free 1 month subscription to my online newsletter!

 

$190.00 + sh

$99.00 + sh

Go to www.lamarzulli.net

*Additional shipping fee on International shipping may apply

Watchers-Set

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

L. A. 2013 PHOTO 23

January 16 17 – Prophecy Conference California – with Chuck Missler Bob Cornuke! Details soon! Church of the Rock – Riverside California! http://www.rockchurchsr.org/CONFERENCE.html
March 12-15: Lion Heart Ministries in Knoxville Tennessee.  http://www.lionheartministries.org/calendar_conf_NephilimAgenda.php
March 15th: LA Marzulli will minister at Lakewind Church’s Sunday morning service (the conference venue – see above link).
March 18th: Calvary Chapel East Albuquerque

March 20: Farmington – Dine’s Baptist Church 3396 Hwy 62 – Waterflow NM

April 16 – 19:  Northeast Prophecy Summit – http://www.northeastprophecysummit.org/

 April 21! UPARS – Studio City – Los Angeles – Studio City at 12355 Moorpark Ave., 91604. http://www.meetup.com/UPARS-Los-Angeles/

April 24-26: Memphis Tennessee – http://www.watchersconference.com

April 28h: Nashville! https://www.eventbrite.com/e/invasion-featuring-guest-authorlecturer-la-marzulli-tickets-15929991032

May 1-3 : Calvary Chapel Kennebec Valley located in Fairfield Maine!  www.cckennebecvalley.org

September 12: Nephilm Mounds III – Russ Dizdar – L. A. Marzulli, Gary Stearman, Chief Joseph Riverwind Fritz Zimmerman!   http://www.nephilimmounds3.com

Just Added! September 19th – Prophecy Conference – Details soon

Just Added!  October 23-26 – Atlanta – www.freedomslightchurchofgod.org 

To book L. A. Marzulli please email him at la@lamarzulli.net 

L. A. Marzulli shares the platform with a variety of speakers with many different world views. Marzulli does not endorse anyones world view unless specifically noted

About these ads

Article source: https://lamarzulli.wordpress.com/2015/04/29/we-will-not-obey-cultural-push-back/


Don’t let urban unrest derail conservative criminal justice reform

After nearly a year of urban violence, anti-law enforcement demonstrations, and racial riots that shook America’s cities to their foundations, it would be easy for conservatives to abandon the project of reforming the nation’s criminal justice system. That would be a terrible mistake.

In the wake of a New York City grand jury’s failure to indict the NYPD officer responsible for the death of Eric Garner, a consensus opinion emerged on both the left and the right. Both ends of the political spectrum in the United States appeared to agree that it was appropriate to contemplate how to reform the system that determines whether police are deemed to have used inappropriate levels of force. “Hands up, don’t shoot,” was a myth and a lie propagated by agitators and a compliant media. “I can’t breathe,” was all too real.

It wasn’t merely the absurdity of Officer Daniel Pantaleo’s exoneration by a grand jury that sparked calls for reforms to the criminal justice system. Republicans have long understood that reforming sentencing for drug offenders is a necessary priority. After decades of waging a failed war on drugs, the right has largely come around to the notion that this policing strategy has only criminalized non-violent offenders and squandered billions of taxpayer dollars in the process.

Furthermore, few Americans are comfortable with the inordinately large prison population in the United States. The number of inmates in America declined slightly last year for the first time in decades, but America’s rates of incarceration and recidivism are absurd in comparison to other nations.

“More than 700 of every 100,000 Americans is behind bars. That compares with a rate of about 75 per 100,000 in Norway, Germany and the Netherlands. Those nations also have a much lower rate of recidivism, about half of that of the U.S.,” a recent Deseret News editorial read.

Some might assume that only presidential candidates like Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) have championed criminal justice reform, but the GOP field is replete with candidates who acknowledge that turning a critical eye toward the justice system is a worthy enterprise.

On Tuesday, The New York Times published an important guide to understand where the slate of 2016 candidates stand criminal justice reform. Nearly every declared or undeclared candidate has embraced reforms to sentencing, parole and probation, and restrictions on judicial discretion. It is, however, easy to see how a recent spate of urban violence might lead the Republican primary electorate to embrace a “tough on crime” candidate. That would be a mistake.

He’s right. In Ferguson, Missouri, the Department of Justice determined that systematic police abuses were substantiated. Baltimore, too, has been the subject of DOJ investigations into police misconduct. “The city has paid $5.7 million in court judgments and settlements in 102 cases since 2011, and nearly all of the people who received payouts were cleared of criminal charges, according to the investigation published this week,” The Baltimore Sun reported in October of last year.

These are just two of many American cities that have been investigated for police misconduct. While there has been no widespread racial violence in cities like New Orleans and Cleveland, such tragedies may be forthcoming.

It would be unwise to dismiss Balko’s admonition. Just as it is foolish and irresponsible to blame anyone other than the violent for outbreaks of violence, it is unadvisable to pretend as though there is no criminal justice problem in America. The GOP will get no credit from minority voters for reforming the criminal justice system, but that is not why this project should be engaged.

As a matter of good policy and sound governance, conservatives should not abandon criminal justice reform ahead of 2016.

Related Posts:

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/28/dont-let-urban-unrest-derail-conservative-criminal-justice-reform/


Finally: Bernie Sanders will announce for president tomorrow

Longtime Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders will jump into the 2016 fray tomorrow, presenting the first official challenge to Hillary Clinton from her left. Liberal activists have been quite anxious for such a challenger, though the one they wanted was a bit younger and female. A self-described socialist in the style of the European democratic socialists, Sanders will bring fresh, innovative ideas to the table, like: Corporations are bad and have too much influence on our giant, ineffective, unaccountable government, so let’s make government bigger to fix the problem and also take a lot more money from the rich. They’re the worst. (And, more hot Koch Brother talk!)

Here’s the news from—where else?— Vermont Public Radio:

VPR News has learned from several sources that Independent U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders will announce his candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination on Thursday.

Sanders will release a short statement on that day and then hold a major campaign kickoff in Vermont in several weeks.

Sanders’ entry into the Democratic race ensures that Hillary Clinton will face a challenge to win the support of the liberal wing of the party.

Sanders’ basic message will be that the middle class in America has been decimated in the past two decades while wealthy people and corporations have flourished.

His opposition to a proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal (T.P.P.) shows how he plans to frame this key issue of his campaign.

He will run as a Democrat, thereby getting himself a ticket to the debate stage. He’ll announce tomorrow and hold a rally…next month. Because this thing is a rocket ship, people!

One ally — who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss Sanders’s timetable — said the 73-year-old senator is expected to make his intentions known this week and hold a rally in Vermont next month. He plans to run as a Democrat, according to his associates.

Update: Room for Berniementum?

Update: At least Hillary can fall back on her ever-present charm and transparency:

Hillary Clinton – very deep in thought today – leaving very first fundraiser of 2016. #NYC #2016

A video posted by Liz Kreutz (@kreutzel) on Apr 28, 2015 at 2:29pm PDT

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/28/finally-bernie-sanders-will-announce-for-president-tomorrow/


Video: Overalled local news hero stops motorcycle chase with his body, apologizes for cursing

There’s plenty in the news to make one depressed today. Here’s something tomake you smile.

Out of Chickasha, Okla. comes the man who should be the next viral local news hero—Floyd Briggs. Wearing a camo hat and overalls tucked into one cowboy boot, he shares with the local news crew how he was able to step out in front of a motorcyclist evading police, causing him to swerve to avoid Briggs and lay down the bike. The perp then fled on foot, but Briggs brought him down. It later turned out the suspect had only run from police for a minor violation, but we can credit Briggs with ending a high-speed chase before it got any more dangerous (to anyone but him, that is).

“I said ‘I gotta stop this guy before he hurts a little kid,’” Chickasha resident Floyd Briggs said. “I ain’t no football player either.”

He describes the chase:

“I was running out of steam very quick. I’m not very aerodynamic,” Briggs noted.

And, an apology for everyone who saw the incident in person:

“I did use some language that just isn’t how I talk…Some of the words I used, I was pretty worked up. I’m sorry for that,” Briggs said.

Bring on the autotune.

Article source: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/28/video-overalled-local-news-hero-stops-motorcycle-chase-with-his-body-apologizes-for-cursing/


%d bloggers like this: